Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail in High-Profile Wildlife Crime Case

Court Cites Serious Allegations and Lack of Material Change in Circumstances as Reasons for Denial

In a significant ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Gwalior, presided over by Justice Milind Ramesh Phadke, dismissed the third bail application of Devisingh, who is accused of illegal hunting and possession of protected wildlife material. The bail application was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the applicant facing charges under various sections of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

The prosecution's case revolves around the alleged illegal hunting activities in the Son Chidiya Sanctuary, Ghatigaon. Devisingh was apprehended on June 21, 2025, when forest officials recovered the head and limbs of a spotted deer from his possession. Despite the applicant's argument pointing to contradictions in the testimony of a key witness, the court found no substantial change in circumstances that would justify granting bail.

Justice Phadke emphasized the gravity of the allegations, noting the serious implications for wildlife preservation and public interest. The court highlighted that the prosecution's case is supported by contemporaneous documents and investigation material beyond the testimony of a single witness. Moreover, the court expressed concerns about the possibility of the applicant influencing witnesses if released on bail.

The court reiterated the stringent provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act, which prescribe severe penalties for hunting protected species. Given the nature of the charges and the absence of a material change in circumstances, the court concluded that the bail application lacked merit and should be dismissed.

This decision underscores the judiciary's stance on wildlife crimes and its commitment to upholding environmental laws. The case is expected to continue in the trial court, where the evidentiary value of witness testimonies and other materials will be further scrutinized.

Bottom Line:

Bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences under Indian Forest Act, 1927, and Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, rejected in the absence of material change in circumstances and considering the gravity of allegations related to illegal hunting and possession of protected wildlife material.

Statutory provision(s): Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Sections 26 and 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, Sections 9, 27, 50, and 51 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

Devisingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (Madhya Pradesh)(Gwalior) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2809484