LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Supreme Court Upholds Right for Re-determination of Compensation Based on Appellate Court Awards

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | March 27, 2026 at 9:59 AM
Supreme Court Upholds Right for Re-determination of Compensation Based on Appellate Court Awards

Landmark ruling ensures equitable compensation for all landowners under the Land Acquisition Act


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has clarified the application of Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, affirming that landowners are entitled to seek re-determination of compensation based on appellate court awards, not just those of the Reference Court. The ruling came in the case of Andanayya and Ors. v. Deputy Chief Engineer, where the appellants challenged the rejection of their second application for re-determination of compensation by the Collector, despite having already received compensation based on the Reference Court's award.


The Supreme Court, comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, set aside the Karnataka High Court's Division Bench decision which had barred the re-determination based on an appellate court's award, citing reliance on an earlier Supreme Court judgment in Ramsingbhai Jerambhai v. State of Gujarat.


The apex court emphasized the doctrine of merger, where an appellate court's award subsumes the Reference Court's award, thereby entitling similarly placed landowners to seek enhanced compensation based on the appellate court's final decision. This interpretation aligns with the legislative intent behind Section 28-A, aimed at ensuring equality and fairness among landowners affected by land acquisition.


The appellants' land was initially acquired for the Hubballi-Ankola Broad Gauge Line, and although they accepted compensation determined by the Reference Court, further enhancement was later granted by the High Court, prompting their second application under Section 28-A. The Supreme Court clarified that such second applications are indeed maintainable, as the object of the Act is to maintain parity among landowners, and procedural technicalities should not hinder justice.


The ruling is expected to have significant implications for landowners across the country, ensuring that those who did not initially seek a reference can still benefit from enhanced compensation awarded by appellate courts, thereby promoting fairness and reducing inequality in compensation.


Statutory provision(s): Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 28-A


Andanayya v. Deputy Chief Engineer, (SC) : Law Finder Doc id # 2871988

Share this article: