Supreme Court mandates two-week period for Wankhede to reply to chargesheet before appointing Inquiry Officer
In a significant ruling on March 25, 2026, the Supreme Court of India has reinforced the principles of fair inquiry proceedings, ensuring that individuals facing charges are given adequate opportunity to respond. The case, titled Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede v. Union Of India, revolved around the premature appointment of an Inquiry Officer and a Presenting Officer by the respondents without allowing Wankhede sufficient time to file a reply to the chargesheet.
The bench, comprising Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, observed that the appointment made on March 7, 2026, was not justified as the petitioner had not been afforded adequate opportunity to present his defense. Recognizing the importance of procedural fairness, the Supreme Court has now permitted Wankhede to file his reply within two weeks from the date of the order. Following this, the respondents are required to deliberate on Wankhede's reply and decide on the appointment of an Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer within the subsequent two weeks.
The ruling underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the rights of individuals in disciplinary proceedings, ensuring they are not unduly prejudiced by procedural lapses. The court clarified that it has not delved into the merits of the case, focusing solely on procedural fairness.
Senior Advocate Mr. P.S. Patwalia represented the petitioner alongside a team of advocates, while the respondents were represented by Additional Solicitor Generals and other legal professionals. The decision marks a pivotal moment in procedural jurisprudence, highlighting the necessity for authorities to adhere to due process.
The Supreme Court's decision to dispose of the Special Leave Petition, while emphasizing procedural rights, serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining equity in administrative actions. Pending applications related to the case have also been disposed of, as per the court's order.
Bottom Line:
Inquiry proceedings - Appointment of Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to file reply to the chargesheet is not justified - Petitioner allowed to file reply to chargesheet within two weeks and respondent(s) to decide on appointment of Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer after considering petitioner's reply.
Statutory provision(s): Inquiry proceedings
Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede v. Union Of India, (SC) : Law Finder Doc id # 2872033
