LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Calcutta High Court Holds State Vicariously Liable for Medical Negligence in Government Hospital, Awards Rs. 5 Lakh Compensation for Loss of Eyesight

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK |
Calcutta High Court Holds State Vicariously Liable for Medical Negligence in Government Hospital, Awards Rs. 5 Lakh Compensation for Loss of Eyesight

Violation of Fundamental Right to Life under Article 21 Confirmed; Court Emphasizes State's Duty to Ensure Proper Infrastructure and Quality Medical Care in Public Hospitals


In a landmark judgment dated September 2, 2026, the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising Justices Shampa Sarkar and Arjun Ray Mukherjee has held the State of West Bengal vicariously liable for medical negligence that resulted in the partial blindness of Gobinda Chandra Debnath, an electrician and sole breadwinner of his family. The negligence occurred during cataract surgery performed at Gardenreach State General Hospital and Metiabruz Super-Speciality Hospital, South 24-Parganas.


The Court observed that the unfortunate medical complications were due to contamination of operative devices and solutions, as well as faulty sterilization practices, confirmed by the Director of the Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Kolkata. Moreover, the Court highlighted infrastructural deficiencies and lack of trained nursing and OT staff in the hospitals, which had been previously identified by a medical board but inadequately addressed. The operating theatres lacked proper placement of entrances and wash basins, and essential sterilization protocols were not followed, leading to infections affecting numerous patients, including the appellant.


Rejecting the medical board's contradictory conclusion that no negligence occurred, the Court emphasized that such findings were unreasoned and inconsistent with contemporaneous medical evidence and treatment records. The Court underscored that the State hospitals must provide basic infrastructural facilities to ensure safe and dignified medical treatment, failing which it amounts to a constitutional tort infringing upon the fundamental right to life and health guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.


Relying on established Supreme Court precedents including D.K. Basu v. State of W.B., Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, and Achutrao Haribhau Khodwa v. State of Maharashtra, the Court reaffirmed that the doctrine of sovereign immunity does not protect the State in cases of constitutional violations caused by negligence. The Court also invoked the principle of strict liability, holding the State accountable for the actions of its hospital staff and the resulting harm to patients.


As a public law remedy, the Court awarded Rs. 5,00,000 as compensation to the appellant to cover medical expenses, loss of future earning prospects, and the severe impact on his quality of life. The compensation is to be paid within eight weeks, failing which interest at 6% per annum will accrue. The Court also clarified that this compensation does not preclude the appellant from seeking further civil remedies if desired.


This judgment sends a strong message to state governments and public hospitals that ensuring proper infrastructure, sterilization, and trained personnel is not optional but a constitutional mandate. The right to health and medical care is an integral part of the right to life, and the State must be held accountable for failures that jeopardize this right. The Court's decision reflects the judiciary's commitment to protect vulnerable citizens from medical negligence and provide effective redressal under constitutional law without relegating them to lengthy civil litigation.


Bottom Line:

Medical negligence in a government hospital resulting in loss of eyesight - Violation of the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India - State held vicariously liable under the principle of strict liability and awarded compensation without relegating the victim to a civil forum.


Statutory provision(s):

Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution of India


Gobinda Chandra Debnath v. State of West Bengal, (Calcutta)(DB) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2972570

Share this article: