Court directs trial court to expedite proceedings while underscoring the alarming surge in digital scams affecting innocent victims
In a recent judgment delivered on October 13, 2026, the Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), presided over by Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, dismissed the third bail applications filed by Meghraj Saini and Karan Yadav, accused in a cyber crime case. The petitioners sought bail after their previous two bail requests were denied, arguing that the statements of the informant and other witnesses had already been recorded and they had been in custody for a prolonged period.
The case originated from complaints against the petitioners for their alleged involvement in cyber frauds. The prosecution highlighted that charge-sheets had been filed, and multiple similar complaints were lodged against one of the petitioners, Karan Yadav. It was further submitted that the accused, in connivance with the main accused Jasraj Meena, lured innocent individuals under the pretext of earning extra income, only to deceive them and unlawfully obtain money.
Upon hearing the arguments, the Court observed that there was no material change in the facts or circumstances since the earlier bail rejections. Emphasizing the gravity of the offences and the allegations, the Court declined to entertain the third bail application.
In its detailed observations, the Court noted the growing menace of cyber crimes and digital frauds in India and worldwide. It remarked on the alarming increase in scams involving online banking frauds and phishing attacks, which have caused substantial financial losses to many unsuspecting victims. The Court recognized that such crimes are among the most insidious in the digital age, exploiting the rapid growth of internet-based financial services.
While dismissing the bail pleas, the Court instructed the trial court to expedite the trial process and not be influenced by the observations made during the bail hearings. The trial court was urged to decide the matter strictly on the basis of evidence presented by both prosecution and defense, ensuring a fair and timely conclusion.
This judgment reflects the judiciary's stern stance against cyber criminals amidst rising digital frauds, balancing the rights of the accused with the larger interest of protecting innocent citizens from cyber exploitation.
Bottom Line:
Third bail applications in cyber crime case were rejected in absence of any material change in facts and circumstances; Court considered gravity of offence, earlier rejection of bail twice, and increasing menace of cyber frauds, while directing trial court to conclude trial expeditiously.
Statutory provision(s):
Information Technology Act, 2000, Indian Penal Code (IPC) related to cheating and fraud.
Meghraj Saini v. State of Rajasthan, (Rajasthan)(Jaipur Bench) : Law Finder Doc Id # 3001729
