LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders Swift Resolution in Decade-Long Civil Dispute

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK |
Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders Swift Resolution in Decade-Long Civil Dispute

Case Transferred to 26th Additional District Judge for Expedited Hearing and Disposal within 90 Days


In a significant move aimed at expediting the judicial process, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered the transfer of a long-pending civil case to the 26th Additional District Judge, Indore. The decision was made by Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt following a detailed review of the case, which has been pending since 2009 and was renumbered in 2016.


The case, involving the Ayodhyapuri Rahwasi Kalyan Samiti against the State of Madhya Pradesh, highlights the challenges of prolonged litigation. Initially heard in the court of the 31st Additional District Judge, the matter was transferred to the 32nd Additional District Judge due to administrative reasons. However, both courts faced delays in advancing the proceedings.


Citing Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Justice Bhatt emphasized the importance of transferring the case to a court that can prioritize its swift resolution. The transfer to Dr. Shubhra Singyh, the 26th Additional District Judge, was deemed necessary to address the parties' concerns and the larger interest of justice.


Counsels for all parties assured the court of their cooperation to avoid unnecessary adjournments and to facilitate the final arguments. The court directed the newly assigned judge to prioritize the hearing, with a mandate to conclude the proceedings within 90 days of receiving the order.


This decision marks a significant step in addressing the backlog of cases and ensuring timely justice. The court's directive underscores the judiciary's commitment to efficient legal processes and the resolution of long-standing disputes.


Bottom Line :

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 24 Transfer of proceedings - In case of transfer of a matter, it is advisable to send the case to the Presiding Officer who has earlier heard the matter in detail. However, considering the totality of facts, circumstances, and apprehensions of the parties, the matter can be transferred to another court in the larger interest of justice.


Statutory provision(s): Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 24


Ayodhyapuri Rahwasi Kalyan Samiti v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (Madhya Pradesh)(Indore) : Law Finder Doc id # 2967120

Share this article: